System and method for providing financial planning and advice

ABSTRACT

The system facilitates portfolio advising and planning for a client. The system includes a portfolio integration module configured to receive and integrate data, wherein the data includes a client&#39;s goals, assets, savings and risk tolerance, wherein the portfolio integration module is further configures to compute a customized strategy based on the received data. The portfolio reconciler module is configured to compare a customized strategy to at least one of the other strategies, based on the received and integrated data in order to further facilitate the financial portfolio planning of the client, wherein the financial portfolio planning analyzes both planned hypothetical events and unplanned hypothetical events. The stochastic modeling module is configures to further analyze proposed situation portfolios based on future uncertainties, wherein future uncertainties include the unplanned hypothetical events. The simulation module is configured to compute the probability of meeting the client&#39;s goals.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to, and the benefit of, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/309,103, entitled “System and Method For Providing Financial Planning And Advice”, filed Jul. 31, 2001, the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference. The present invention is related to U.S. Ser. No. 09/712,743, entitled “System and Method For Creating Financial Advice Applications” and filed Nov. 14, 2000; U.S. Ser. No. 09/731,163, entitled “System and Method For Evaluating Work Product” and filed Dec. 6, 2000; and U.S. Ser. No. 09/141,013, entitled “Computer-Implemented Program For Planning and Advice System” and filed Aug. 26, 1998; all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to financial planning and advice systems and, more specifically, to financial planning and advice systems using stochastic modeling with a stationary bootstrap sampling method to model a user's financial situation.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Achieving personal financial objectives generally includes a long-term relationship with a trusted and knowledgeable financial advisor who can assist with periodic financial planning. A financial advisor who is able to develop these types of relationships and meet a client's need for periodic financial planning thereby facilitates client retention. Inaccurate consumer impressions that financial planning is a once in a lifetime event should be mitigated in order to facilitate advisor-client relationships and accurately assess the client's current financial position as well as their future direction. An initial evaluation of a client's financial situation, followed by periodic reevaluation in light of changes in asset performance, market conditions, and client objectives, is important for the realization of the client's financial goals. Since initiating, building, and maintaining long-term advisory relationships with a client aids in becoming a successful advisor, financial planners are constantly searching for methods to foster this relationship in an effort to better serve clients and remain competitive.

Generally, the financial advice and information that is provided in a financial plan is becoming standardized as a result of the standards set forth by the Certified Financial Planning College and the adoption of those standards by the International Organization of Standards (ISO). Therefore, minimum levels of quality regarding the financial advice provided to clients are required to meet these standards and satisfy consumer needs.

However, consumers of financial advice are becoming increasingly sophisticated and are, therefore, demanding more complete services from financial service companies and advisors.

For example, in order for a financial advisor to prepare a comprehensive, integrated, financial plan for a client, it is useful to be able to illustrate to the. client the effects of future uncertainty on that financial plan. A financial planner's ability to model the effects of unpredictable future events enhances the value of a financial plan to a client because it allows the client to prepare for those events in proportion to the likelihood of their eventuality.

Conventional financial advice applications generally ask the financial planner to input assumed rates of return (or a return rate that is calculated based upon the client's current investment portfolio) for the client's current and proposed investment portfolio without determining the type of strategy that might be best suited to the particular client's financial situation and objectives. In addition, a myriad of commercially available products target each of the three main financial categories, that is, cash, equity, and bonds, as well as the various subcategories of each. For example, equity funds can be categorized as domestic or international, large cap stock, small cap stock, etc. While it is difficult to keep abreast of all the mutual funds that a particular company may offer, financial planners are assisted in the selection of financial investment products by a variety of tools that can access and store the product offerings of at least a particular company in a database.

These conventional applications are unsatisfactory in several regards. Existing model portfolio engines do not adequately blend short-term and long-term needs to arrive at a client's recommended portfolio. Financial products capable of meeting the recommended portfolio are typically selected outside of the application. Conventional applications often fail to provide a current list of available products within the application that are directed to specific consumer needs. Furthermore, these applications do not offer an adequate proposed investment strategy for the client. Current financial planning tools usually provide deterministic illustrations (which may foster a false sense of certainty). Moreover, existing financial applications often provide stochastic modeling only of retirement goals and do not normally present stochastic models addressing lifetime cash flow, disability, long-term care, and death, for example. Finally, current applications do not offer personalized quality financial advice that is consistent with industry standards and tailored to the client's individualized needs.

In view of the foregoing, there is a need for financial planning systems and methods which overcome the shortcomings of conventional computer implemented financial planning applications.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides systems and methods for probability modeling which facilitates financial advising and planning. A portfolio integration module facilitates integration of at least one of a user's goals, assets, savings, and risk tolerance in analyzing and developing a customized strategy for financial planning of the user. A portfolio reconciler module communicates with the portfolio integration module to facilitate comparison of the customized strategy to other strategies and projected financial decisions in order to further facilitate the financial planning of the user. A stochastic modeling module in communication with the portfolio integration module and the portfolio reconciler module uses data from the portfolio integration module and/or the portfolio reconciler module in a stochastic modeling analysis to facilitate creation of a proposed situation portfolio for the user. The stochastic modeling module uses a synchronous stationary bootstrap method of statistical sampling to facilitate analysis of historical economic data in order to facilitate creation of the proposed situation portfolio. A simulator module in communication with the portfolio integration module and the stochastic modeling module may be used to forecast the effects of changes to the probability modeling system and to monitor and test the system over a predetermined amount of time.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Additional aspects of the present invention will become evident upon reviewing the non-limiting embodiments described in the specification, the appendices and the claims taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein like numerals designate like elements, and wherein:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system for facilitating financial planning and advising for a user in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a more detailed system for facilitating financial planning and advising for a user in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method for facilitating financial planning and advising for a user in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates the bootstrapped estimate of the samples' geometric mean standard errors as functions of block size 1/p;

FIG. 5 illustrates the cyclical behavior of Japanese inflation within a period of about 12 months;

FIG. 6 illustrates the bootstrapped autocorrelation estimate for Japanese inflation; and

FIG. 7 illustrates the bootstrapped auto covariance estimate for Japanese inflation.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following disclosure presents, describes and teaches various exemplary embodiments in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it should be understood that other embodiments may be realized without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, the following detailed description is presented for purposes of illustration only, and not of limitation, and the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims.

The system of the invention, as well as any of its component systems, may include a host server or other computing system, including a processor for processing digital data, a memory in communication with the processor for storing digital data, an input digitizer in communication with the processor for inputting digital data, an application program stored in the memory and accessible by the processor for directing the processing of digital data by the processor, a display in communication with the processor and memory for displaying information derived from digital data processed by the processor and a plurality of databases, the databases including client data, merchant data, financial institution data and/or like data that could be used in association with the present invention.

The present invention includes, in general, a comprehensive and integrated financial advising and planning system. The system includes probability modeling which facilitates the determination of the probability for successfully achieving identified personal financial goals based upon at least one of thousands of hypothetical projections of each of several types of scenarios, which may include, for example, scenarios such as the premature death, disability, retirement, and/or long-term care needs of any member of a particular household or other economic group. The probability modeling facilitates quantification of future uncertainty through statistically valid sampling to provide accurate simulations of a client's potential financial future. Each scenario has its own simulation-sets, which use, for example, common underlying economic and portfolio assumptions and combine these assumptions with unique scenario-specific cash flow activity. In this way, the resources used to meet financial goals and address concerns are rationally interactive and integrated between scenarios. For example, resources used to purchase disability insurance may not be available as savings for college education, or tax savings resulting from the use of tax-deferred vehicles may have a positive effect on all scenarios. The system can also select appropriate strategies and tactics for achieving selected personal financial goals and/or facilitate the selection of appropriate strategies depending on the needs of the system and users. The system also enables financial advisors and their clients to collaborate over the Internet to conduct financial planning for the client.

FIG. 1 illustrates a system 100 for facilitating financial planning and advising for a user 101 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. System 100 includes user 101 in communication with a financial advisor 103 and a server 105 via communication channels 115 and 117, respectively. Financial advisor 103 and server 105 also communicate via communication channel 119. Communication channels 115, 117, and 119 may be one channel or separate channels depending on the needs of system 100. In addition, user 101 and financial advisor 103 are illustrated as separate elements, but may also be the same element depending on the needs of system 100.

User 101 submits data to financial advisor 103 and/or server 105 via communication channels 115 and 117. The data may include user financial information (e.g., current and expected income, expenses, liabilities, assets, policies, taxes, Social Security/social pension, social pension information, company pension, and/or the like), user personal information (e.g., marital status, date of birth, age, occupation, lifestyle, family members, and/or the like), user goals, System assumptions, user risk tolerance, and/or the like. User's 101 net worth is one measure of financial security and can be used along with an analysis of cash flow to help determine user's 101 ability to achieve his or her goals. For example, net worth is calculated by subtracting the total liabilities from the total assets. User and/or system assumptions include assumptions in connection with investment performance, inflation, taxation, cost of insurance, cost of insurance growth rates, interest rates, risk tolerance and personal needs and objectives. Depending on the needs of system 100 and/or user 101, such assumptions could be designated by user 101. In this manner, system 100 does not rely on user 101 to make difficult uneducated decisions about future inflation rates, interest rates, investment market performance, cost of insurance growth rates, and/or the like. Financial advisor 103 can help user 101 select appropriate assumptions. For example, user 101 provides the ownership information and current values of assets and insurance policies to server 105. However, some of these assumptions may be modified in the process of analyzing user's 101 goals.

User 101 can quickly provide personalized and high-quality financial data to system 100 and receive quick financial advice. Based upon user's 101 data input, server 105 receives user's 101 current situation (e.g., current investment portfolio, insurance information, personal information, scenario information (e.g., insurance, tax, disability, long-term care, goals, and/or the like)). Server 105 can create a proposed situation portfolio based upon at least one of user's 101 data input, goals, and goal assumptions. A proposed situation portfolio may include a proposed investment portfolio along with, for example, scenarios (e.g., normal life span, disability, long-term care (e.g., costs, benefit, etc.), early death, and/or the like), life insurance information (e.g., costs, death benefit, etc.), disability insurance information (e.g., costs, disability benefit, etc.), Social Security, social pension, asset structure, savings, goals, retirement information, expenses, tax structure of assets and otherwise, savings, and/or company pension information, and other factors affecting a person's (or family member's) financial or personal situation. Proposed investment portfolios illustrate different methods of investing assets across various types of investments and may include, for example, asset structure, savings amounts, goals and amounts, retirement information, and/or the like. These proposed situation portfolios may improve the likelihood of success given a risk tolerance and a timeframe to achieve selected goals. In particular, server 105 is provided with the timeframe to achieve the goal, the dollar amount related to the goal, assets and savings available to meet the goal, and user's 101 risk tolerance. Simulations are run for each of the current situation and the proposed situation portfolio and the simulations compare user's 101 current situation with the proposed situation portfolio.

When data is submitted to server 105, various elements within server 105 analyze the data to create and present advice to user 101 in the form of a proposed situation portfolio. Server 105 includes, in one embodiment, portfolio integration module 107, portfolio reconciler module 109, stochastic modeling module 111, and simulator module 113, which analyze the data to facilitate creating and presenting advice to user 101. Portfolio integration module 107 facilitates integration of at least one of a user's 101 goals, assets, savings, and risk tolerance into customized proposed situation portfolio. Portfolio reconciler module 109 uses the proposed situation portfolio to facilitate allocation of assets, develop specific investments to fulfill investment strategies, and/or gather savings and premiums to develop specific investments appropriate for the proposed investment portfolio. Stochastic modeling module 111 uses a stochastic sampling methodology of synchronous station bootstrap sampling of historical data to develop the probability of financial success after review of at least one of user's 101 data, user's 101 goals, user's 101 goal assumptions, and historical data. Probability of financial success may be developed by creating discrete projections of future market and economic behavior and applying these projections to user's 101 data in conjunction with various scenario assumptions. In each projection, user 101 may not be able to fund one or more of the goals depending on the needs of user 101. The individual successes and failures in the projections are aggregated by stochastic modeling module 111 to develop the probability of success. Simulator module 113 uses the data to simulate, monitor, and test portfolio integration module 107, portfolio reconciler module 109, and/or stochastic modeling module 111. Simulator module 113 may be a part of server 105 or separate from server 105 (e.g., on a separate server or other device) depending on the needs of system 100.

Portfolio Integration

In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, portfolio integration module 107 integrates at least one of a user's 101 goals, assets, savings, and risk tolerance into customized proposed situation portfolio. Portfolio integration module 107 determines the portfolio strategies by considering the timing of at least one of a user's 101 goals, the amount of user's 101 goals, the amount of user's 101 asset base, the amount of user's 101 savings, and the user's 101 risk tolerance. The portfolio strategies include various portfolios, such as taxable assets, taxable savings, and tax-deferred assets/savings. These portfolios allow server 105 to distinguish between assets and savings needed to meet short-term goals and assets and savings needed for long-term goals. In this manner, the proposed situation portfolio balances short-term market risks with long-term return potential. For example, portfolio integration module 107 can assess changes in financial planning assumptions, tax laws, other laws and regulations, and other developments, and integrate these changes into the proposed situation portfolio.

In one exemplary embodiment, server 105 assumes that consumers will spend their taxable assets first in order to fund their goals and that these assets represent what they have accumulated so far to realize their goals. Server 105 can also assume that savings represent funds that are available to be allocated for goals in the future. Server 105 can further assume that consumers will spend their life insurance cash value and premiums (e.g., net of the cost of insurance) before their tax-deferred retirement assets. Finally, server 105 can assume that consumers will spend their tax-deferred retirement assets last in order to leverage the tax advantages of deferred growth.

Portfolio integration module 107 determines the timeframe for user's 101 goals and the assets and savings user 101 may need in the short-term (e.g., within 10 years). Portfolio integration module 107 takes into account the relative timing and dollar amounts of the goals that will occur within, for example, 10 years. Large goals that may occur right away will be weighted more heavily than small goals that may occur later. A determination is made for the long-term portfolio's timeframe based on the retirement date or the earliest retirement date (if the analysis is for more than one user). User's 101 risk tolerance is ascertained along with each time frame in order to map the customized proposed situation portfolio.

Portfolio integration module 107 uses various portfolios to develop the customized proposed situation portfolio. Various portfolios include, for example: regular assets, which provide a cash/fixed/equity mix for the taxable assets; regular contributions, which provide a cash/fixed/equity mix for ongoing contributions (e.g., savings) to taxable accounts; retirement assets and contributions, which provide a cash/fixed/equity mix for retirement plans and other tax-deferred assets and ongoing contributions (e.g., savings); VUL (Variable Universal Life) insurance cash values and premiums for those policies used to fund goals, which provide a cash/fixed/equity mix for life policy cash values and ongoing premiums; VUL insurance cash values and premiums for those policies not used to fund goals, which provide a cash/fixed/equity mix for life policy cash values and ongoing premiums, and/or the like. These portfolios allow portfolio integration module 107 to distinguish between assets and contributions needed to meet short-term goals and assets and contributions needed for long-term goals. In this manner, the model allocation balances the short-term risks in the market with long-term return potential.

For example, a taxable assets portfolio(s) and/or a taxable savings portfolio(s) have a short-term model portfolio based on an average-weighted timeframe and risk tolerance and a long-term model portfolio based on first retirement date and risk tolerance. A retirement savings and asset portfolio is based on first retirement date and risk tolerance. A portfolio associated with cash values and premiums may be a short-term model portfolio based on timeframe and risk tolerance. As such, these portfolios are used in portfolio integration module 107 to help develop the customized proposed situation portfolio.

Portfolio integration module 107 also determines the amount of taxable assets to be invested in the short-term and/or long-term assets portfolios. Portfolio integration module 107 divides the dollar value of all goals occurring, within for example ten years, by the value of the taxable assets. The result is the percentage of taxable assets to invest in the short-term assets portfolio. If user 101 has more assets than are needed to fund these goals, then part of the assets may be invested short-term and the remaining assets may be invested in the long-term assets portfolio (e.g., to fund goals that extend beyond 10 years). On the other hand, if user 101 does not have enough assets to fund these goals, the shortage can be funded out of user's 101 on-going savings and tax-deferred assets. Finally, the short-term and long-term assets portfolios are combined into one portfolio, namely, the taxable assets portfolio.

Portfolio integration module 107 then determines the amount of taxable savings to be invested in the short-term and long-term savings portfolios. This calculation is made by subtracting user's 101 taxable assets from the value of the goals occurring within 10 years, for example. The result of this calculation is the value of the goals that are not covered by user's 101 taxable assets; any shortage may be funded from taxable savings. If the asset base covers the goals, then savings are generally not allocated to the short-term portfolio. The present value of the taxable savings is calculated. The funding needed from savings is divided by the present value of the taxable savings. This result is the percentage of savings to allocate to the short-term portfolio. If the value is greater than 1, then all savings can be invested in the short-term portfolio. The remaining savings can be invested in the long-term savings portfolio (1-% short-term). Finally, the short-term and long-term savings portfolios are combined into one portfolio: the taxable savings portfolio.

In addition, portfolio integration module 107 may use a master set of data for user 101 and then analyze that data depending on a number of predetermined scenarios. The different scenarios may represent various circumstances that user 101 may face in a lifetime that may affect user's 101 finances. For example, the master set of data may be analyzed for a normal life expectancy of user 101 and family members, disability of user 101 or family members, long-term care for user 101 or family members, early or unexpected death of user 101 or family members, and/or the like. The master data may be used to generate information for each scenario for each of the current situation and the proposed situation portfolio. The flexibility of portfolio integration module 107 allows for analysis of such scenarios in order to better analyze circumstantial effects on user's 101 finances and the integrated resource allocation between scenarios and user 101 scenarios (e.g., specific cash flow activity projections of user 101).

Thus, a customized portfolio is generated for user 101. Server 105 uses asset returns based on the user's 101 current situation (for the “current” scenario) and the proposed situation portfolio (for the “proposed” scenario). In this way, server 105 can illustrate how user's 101 current situation strategy, user's 101 risk tolerance, and the investment advice contribute to user's 101 ability to reach his or her goals. As user 101 makes changes to the amounts or timing of the goals, any implementation recommendations, user's 101 risk tolerance, and/or the proposed situation portfolio, the effects on user's 101 probability of success is dynamically updated.

Thus, system 100 ties the risk tolerance, resources, and goals to the customized proposed situation portfolio. In this manner, user 101 and/or financial advisor 103 need not input assumed rates of return for user's 101 current and proposed situation portfolios without a link to the type of strategy useful to user 101 or an average return rate calculated from how user's 101 assets are currently invested.

In order to further illustrate portfolio integration module 107, an exemplary illustration of one embodiment of portfolio integration module 107 is attached as Appendix B, which is hereby incorporated by reference. In order to further illustrate cash flow calculations in connection with portfolio integration module 107, an exemplary illustration of one embodiment of calculating such cash flows is attached as Appendix D, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Use, of the terms “Japanese Lightning”, “Lightning”, “Apex”, and/or “application” herein including the Appendices shall mean system 100.

Portfolio Reconciler

Once portfolio integration module 107 develops the proposed situation portfolio for user 101, portfolio reconciler module 109 and/or financial advisor 103 may further develop the proposed situation portfolio by selecting the specific investments to fulfill those strategies. Server 105 uses portfolio reconciler module 109 to illustrate how user's 101 proposed situation portfolio compares to other model portfolio strategies and projected user 101 financial decisions and where changes can be made (e.g., at the asset class level) to the proposed situation portfolio. Portfolio reconciler module 109 facilitates specific action steps for user 101 to make (e.g., moving investment assets from the current portfolio to the proposed investment portfolio). As user 101 and/or financial advisor 103 makes buy, sell, and hold recommendations, portfolio reconciler module 109 monitors the recommendations and dynamically updates progress toward the proposed situation portfolio.

Some user situations may not allow them to invest according to the proposed situation portfolio. For example, user 101 may have tax considerations that prevent him or her from selling a stock. However, since the proposed probability of success is based on the proposed situation portfolio, the completed buy/sell/hold recommendations are tested against the model portfolio strategies to determine if such recommendations are sufficiently close to each other. For example, the buy/sell/hold recommendations may be within a margin of 5% at the cash/fixed/equity level of the proposed situation portfolio. If the recommendations are not sufficiently close, user 101 is informed and advised of the differences and asked to make further adjustments or state reasons for the differences.

Portfolio reconciler module 109 compares the current situation of user 101 and the customized proposed situation portfolio and incorporates specific buy/sell/hold recommendations and/or decisions aiding in developing an appropriate customized proposed situation portfolio for user 101. Furthermore, testing the current investment of user 101 against the proposed investment quantitatively aids user 101 and/or financial advisor 103 in developing appropriate customized proposed situation portfolio for user 101. Still further, the ability to create a customized proposed situation portfolio and provide specific recommendations and available products distributed by a company to user 101 aids user 101 in improving his or her financial portfolio. Portfolio reconciler module 109 is “smart” in that once a particular type of product is selected by user 101, then options within that product type are displayed to user 101. For example, in the case of life insurance, information relevant to life insurance is displayed to user 101. In addition, information relevant to cost of insurance, increase in costs of insurance, savings from investing in insurance, and/or the like are analyzed. If a specific asset class is selected, then investments within that asset class are displayed (e.g., large-cap stock funds). To maintain such information, portfolio reconciler module 109 may be linked through the Internet to the current offerings of any company. Alternatively, portfolio reconciler module 109 may be maintained on a static database that may be updated either by batch processing (i.e., periodic updates) or in real time. Thus, portfolio reconciler module 109 further develops the proposed situation portfolio for user 101 by selecting the specific investments to fulfill those strategies.

In order to further illustrate portfolio reconciler module 109 and portfolio integration module 107, an exemplary illustration of one embodiment of portfolio reconciler module 109 and portfolio integration module 107 is attached as Appendix A, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

Stochastic Modeling Module

During current and/or proposed situation portfolio simulations, server 105 uses stochastic modeling module 111 to aid in modeling the uncertain nature of the future. Examples of uncertainty include inflation, equity and bond market performance, bond returns, and/or the like. Inflation may impact expenses, incomes, and/or the like; whereas, market performance may impact investment returns, potential cost of loans, and/or the like. Stochastic modeling module 111 measures the probability of user 101 reaching his or her lifetime financial goals (e.g., if the current situation portfolio is used versus if the proposed situation portfolio is implemented). Stochastic modeling module 111 analyzes several variables with a wide range of different values from year to year to randomly sample values from actual and/or generated historical data. For example, some historical data (e.g., back to the 1950s) may not be easily accessible, so that stochastic modeling module 111 may generate such historical data given other information from that economic period. The analyses from stochastic modeling module 111 take into consideration both favorable and unfavorable possible performance patterns. The analyses help calculate performance of investments given thousands of different patterns in month-to-month changes in economic conditions (e.g., inflation, cash returns, bond returns, stock market performance, and/or the like) and user 101 data (e.g., risk tolerance, amount and timing of goals, resources available to set aside toward goals, and/or the like).

Based upon the outcomes of the stochastic modeling module 111 and other inputs, a stochastic determination is made and a customized proposed situation portfolio is delivered to user 101. User 101 has the ability to propose specific implementation recommendation adjustments in an effort to match the current situation with the proposed situation portfolio. The proposed situation portfolio may use stochastic modeling module 111 to rerun its analysis and generate an updated stochastic determination, as well as supplemental or updated proposed situation portfolio information. Server 105 provides user 101 with the ability to present information using either stochastic modeling and/or deterministic illustrations in the proposal. As such, user 101 can determine how best to illustrate financial planning concepts or analyze financial planning needs to server 105, and using a stochastic modeling approach allows user 101 a method to communicate his or her needs to server 105.

Server 105 provides for stochastic modeling via stochastic modeling module 111 to illustrate the probability of financial success after review of at least one of user's 101 data, user's 101 goals, user's 101 goal assumptions, savings, asset base, insurance policies, historical data, and/or the like. Stochastic modeling module 111 is in communication with portfolio integration module 107 and portfolio reconciler module 109 for using data from at least one of portfolio integration module 107 and portfolio reconciler module 109 in a stochastic modeling analysis to facilitate creation of a proposed situation portfolio and other planning strategies for user 101. Since it is difficult to predict performance of stock markets or investments for the future, it is helpful to use probability modeling to help account for future uncertainty.

Stochastic modeling module 111 uses a sampling methodology of historical data. Historical data includes inflation rates, rates of return (stock returns, interest rates, and/or the like), T-bill rates, and/or any other information relevant to calculating financial information for user 101. Stochastic modeling module 111 maintains the auto-correlation behavior of inflation (e.g., the modeling of inflation is likely more similar from one period to the next as opposed to moving randomly and erratically) via a synchronous stationary bootstrap sampling method. For example, such modeling is more realistic in that inflation usually goes from 3.5% to 3.7% to 3.6% than 3.5% to 8.5% to 1.5% over a sample 3-year period. Other techniques assume a fixed and constant rate of inflation or model inflation randomly (e.g., 3.5% to 8.5% to 1.5% over a sample 3-year period). Often these techniques force all of the rich information in the historical data to be compressed into three data points: return, variance, and correlation. Unlike such rigid techniques, stochastic modeling module 111 can maintain more information and better simulate the actual behavior of investments relative to each other (e.g., in a market correction, when assets tend to all go down together) and lag effects of inflation on interest rates.

In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, stochastic modeling module 111 uses a stationary bootstrap sampling method of stochastic modeling analysis in sampling the historical data. The stationary bootstrap method uses rates of return, for example, to generate random periods of time (each of which has a rate of return). The stationary bootstrap method randomly selects a starting period in time to draw from, repeats this process, generates a length of time (e.g., one month) from which the period will be extended from, selects another starting period, grabs the specific data points in that period from all indexes in the data set synchronously (e.g., simultaneously), and generates a “P” number. The P number is the length of time of one continuous strip of data and includes the number of periods used in one simulation run of stochastic modeling module 111. For example, the P number can be a period of time (e.g., 40 months) for an economic business period, or any other designation. Data may be sampled synchronously from the relevant economic business periods, pasted together in a sample set of data, and repeated for any type of projected period (e.g., amount of time desired, such as average lifetime, disability time, long-term care time, and/or the like). This sample set of data may be generated for more than one data set at a time, which provides synchronous stationary bootstrap data sampling. For example, a sample data set may represent an average length of an economic business cycle. Synchronous data sampling uses convergence techniques (e.g., a geometric distribution) to calculate accurate rates of return, inflation rates (e.g., serial correlation of inflation), and other such data. Synchronous data sampling leverages information from sample sets of data and extrapolates such information to create larger sets of data over a period of time (e.g., a selected economic business cycle, financial futures, and/or the like). Synchronous data sampling aids in maintaining the integrity and richness of information in the historical data (e.g., effects of change in bond returns over the next several years) in order to provide more accurate rates of return, inflation rates, and other such data. See Dimitris N. Politis & Joseph P. Romano, The Stationary Bootstrap, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1303-1313, Volume 89, Issue 428 (December 1994), which is hereby incorporated by reference.

In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, estimating the p-value in a stationary bootstrap method uses sample results in measuring stability of portfolio performance. Stationarity includes a quality of a process in which the statistical parameters of the process do not substantially change with time. One aspect of a stationary process is that the autocorrelation depends on lag alone and does not change with the time at which it was calculated. Analogies between auto correlated data and independent observations are also described. The stochastic processes in simulation experiments are usually auto correlated and consequently the time series or sample records they generate usually are not analyzed by traditional statistical methods that apply to independent observations. One way to reduce or eliminate autocorrelation is to perform transformations on the original time series. Traditional analysis is then applied assuming the transformed observations are uncorrelated. However, this procedure discards a considerable amount of valuable information about the behavior of a process and that the transformed time series may be inappropriate for comparison purposes. An alternative method is suggested for studying time series by exploiting the autocorrelations rather than eliminating them. The approach centers on estimating standard errors of the bootstrapped sample means for the original series (e.g., for stocks, bonds, cash and inflation) and comparing these statistics for several independent bootstraps.

In performing two bootstraps for the same length of simulated time, there is no reason to expect that the statistical quality of the two resulting time series or sample records will be the same. Suppose that the process being observed has the same variance but is more auto correlated in one experiment than in the other, then the more auto correlated process will generally show fewer changes in value during a given time than the other will. With fewer changes, there is less fluctuation around the mean of the process, and consequently, it is not expected that stochastic modeling module 111 can obtain as good an estimate of the mean for the process with higher correlation as is for the other. This brings up the problem how to determine stability of the sample mean of an auto correlated process so that the dependence structure in the historical series is maintained in the bootstrap samples. Simple random sampling is usually not appropriate since it destroys any dependence in the series.

Accordingly, it is desirable to introduce a resampling procedure called the stationary bootstrap. The procedure is based on resampling blocks of random length, where the length of each block has geometric distribution. The average length of these blocks is 1/p and this quantity plays a similar role as the parameter b in the moving block method.

Although the stationary bootstrap estimate of standard error is less sensitive to the choice of p than the moving blocks bootstrap method is to the choice of b, it is desirable to have an educated guess based on studying the data more deeply. The selection of the p value includes choosing a block size, which involves a tradeoff. As the block size becomes too small, the bootstrap destroys the time dependency of the data and its average accuracy will decline. As the block size becomes too large, there are few blocks and pseudo-data will tend to look alike. As a result, the average accuracy of the bootstrap also will decline. This suggests that there exists an optimal block size, which maximizes accuracy.

The standard error of the sample mean computed from a set of independent observations is inversely proportional to 1/p. This is not true for auto correlated data. However, for a sufficiently small p-value, the standard deviation of the sample mean for auto correlated data is inversely proportional to a fraction number of observations. This fractional number depends on the autocorrelation of the process. Using the correlation time together with the observation interval, the number of independent observations contained in auto correlated time series can be defined. Comparing these measures for two auto correlated samples allows the drawing of inferences about the relative stability of their sample means (as can be done with independent observations).

Based on historical observations of, for example, Japanese stock, bond, cash monthly returns, and inflation, FIG. 4 illustrates the bootstrapped estimate of the samples' geometric mean standard errors as functions of block size 1/p. As the 1/p increases, the corresponding estimate of the standard error initially increases, remains fairly constant, and then decreases. Improved resolution accounts for the initial increase and stabilization, whereas the increasing influence of bias is responsible for the eventual decline. The estimates do appear to stabilize for 1/p between 25 and 50, the decline for greater 1/p introduces skepticism. The following autocorrelation plots illustrated in FIG. 5 reveal more about the randomness of such data sets for if random autocorrelations are near zero for any and all time-lag separations, and if non-random autocorrelations then one or more of the autocorrelations is significantly non-zero. FIG. 5 illustrates the cyclical behavior of Japanese inflation within a period of about 12 months. In this manner, it would be advisable to let 1/p be of the order of two or three cycles to allow for cancellations to take place. In one example, it would be advisable to take 1/p not lower than 38. The bootstrapped autocorrelation estimate for Japanese inflation is illustrated in FIG. 6. After the first three spikes the autocorrelation becomes close to zero for lags greater than 38. FIGS. 6 and 7 also reveal high autocorrelation of cash. In this example, the comparison of the auto covariance structure offers more insights into the true nature of the process. For 1/p greater than 38, the autocorrelation properties of the original data are not significantly eliminated by bootstrap. This leads to an acceptable choice of 1/p not lower than 38. Thus, in this example, it is desirable to avoid underestimating the variance of stock returns in portfolio performance analysis, so that it is advisable to choose 1/p equal to 38.

Thus, an example for estimating p-value in stationary bootstrap has been provided. The example assumes the input data is stationary. However, non-stationary data can also be used to provide a non-stationary bootstrap method. See Dimitris N. Politis, Joseph P. Romano (1994), The Stationary Bootstrap, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Volume 89, Issue 428, 1303-1313; Russell Davidson & James G. MacKinnon, Bootstrap Tests: Size and Power of Bootstrap Tests, Working Paper, Department of Economics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Maurice R. Masliah, Stationarity/Nonstationarity Identification; James G. MacKinnon (1999), Bootstrap Testing in Econometrics, Working Paper Presented at the CEA Annual Meeting; Pin-Huang Chou (1996), Using Bootstrap to test Mean-Variance Efficiency of a Given Portfolio, Working Paper, Department of Finance, National Central University Chung Li, Taiwan; Donald W. K. Andrews & Moshe Buchinsky (1998), Evaluation of a Tree-step Method of Choosing the Number of Bootstrap Repetitions. Working Paper, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University; and Blake LeBaron & Andreas S. Weigend, A Bootstrap Evaluation of the Effect of Data Splitting on Financial Time Series, Working Paper IS-97-013, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University; all of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

The information from the synchronous stationary bootstrap method may be used in a stochastic modeling analysis to estimate user's 101 percentage of likelihood of achieving financial success. For example, many iterations of a lifetime simulation for user 101 can be run (e.g., 6750 iterations) returning either a successful or unsuccessful lifetime simulation. Such a binomial technique can return a successful run if user 101 has a predetermined amount of money or assets at the end of a lifetime simulation (otherwise returning an unsuccessful run). Stochastic modeling module 111 calculates user's 101 chance of achieving financial success using stochastic modeling of, for example, at least any or all of the following: rates of return, inflation rates, specific goals (e.g., education, accumulation, and/or the like), lifetime cash flow with integration of some or all goals, potential disability and/or need for a long-term care and/or death, and/or the like. As such, server 105 does not only address the probability of achieving financial success during retirement, but also considers various scenarios (e.g., long-term care, disability, early death, and/or the like). Stochastic modeling module 111 mimics actual behavior of relevant factors (inflation, rates of return, and/or the like) and allows all assets to be available to fund goals. In this way, if user 101 has too much for one goal, then the excess assets can be applied to another goal. If, for example, user 101 has a shortage of assets, then user 101 can use other assets. Also, user 101 may take out loans for goals that user 101 will pay back with excess income. Stochastic modeling module 111 can model a loan when assets are depleted before retirement, such that a loan balance is created, interest is accrued based on the level of inflation and a risk premium, and savings are applied to paying the loan off. When the loan is paid off, savings are applied to the investment portfolios.

Thus, stochastic modeling module 111 aids in forecasting the effects of various conditions and scenarios on the current situation. Stochastic modeling module 111 allows user 101 to forecast the effects of his or her goals and decisions on thousands of financial situations and provide a likelihood of success for each. In this manner, stochastic modeling module 111 allows user 101 to analyze the effects of his or her decisions on the likelihood of achieving his or her goals by aggregating the results of thousands of possible economic scenarios applied to various situations.

In order to further illustrate stochastic modeling module 111, an exemplary illustration of one embodiment of stochastic modeling module 111 is attached as Appendix C, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

Thus, system 100 analyzes the data to facilitate creating and presenting advice to user 101 and also automates the functions performed by financial advisor 103. Server 105 integrates user's 101 goals, assets, savings, and risk tolerance into customized proposed situation portfolio via portfolio integration module 107. Server 105 uses the proposed situation portfolio to develop specific investments to fulfill those strategies via portfolio reconciler module 109. Server 105 uses a stochastic sampling methodology of historical data to develop the probability of financial success after review of user's 101 data, user's 101 goals, user's 101 assets and savings, various assumptions, and historical data via stochastic modeling module 111.

User 101 can quickly provide personalized, high-quality, financial data to system 100 and receive quick financial advice. After user 101 enters the data, system 100 generates advice that is specifically tailored for user 101. The advice is developed via a system of rules that automatically create and present the advice to user 101. In one exemplary embodiment, the advice includes observations, strategies, and recommendations for the proposed situation portfolio. Each observation, strategy, and recommendation has various aspects (e.g., logic associated with the financial advice analysis and text associated with the output to user 101). See U.S. Ser. No. 09/712,743, entitled “System and Method For Creating Financial Advice Applications” and filed Nov. 14, 2000; U.S. Ser. No. 09/731,163, entitled “System and Method For Evaluating Work Product” and filed Dec. 6, 2000; and U.S. Ser. No. 09/141,013, entitled “Computer-Implemented Program For Planning and Advice System” and filed Aug. 26, 1998; all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

The following data may be used by server 105, in whole or in part, to generate advice for user 101: data entered by the user, calculations preformed by portfolio integration module 107, portfolio reconciler module 109, stochastic modeling module 111, and simulator module 113, and placement of the stochastic results generated by server 105 on a scale (e.g., probability of meeting a goal, percentage of likelihood of success, and/or the like). For example, probabilities and percentages may be valued as follows: 0%-49% indicates a low probability of success in achieving user's 101 selected goals; 50%-74% indicates a moderate probability of success in achieving user's 101 selected goals; and 75% or more indicates a high probability of success in achieving user's 101 selected goals. The probability of success may be calculated by dividing the number of projections where at least one dollar of assets remained (e.g., at the time of retirement, at the time of death, or any other relevant time) by the total number of projections simulated. There are numerous options available to help improve the likelihood of meeting user's 101 selected goals: reduce the amount of goals, delay the start date of goals, save more toward goals, reposition your investment assets, and/or the like. These probabilities and percentages and options may be re-defined by system 100 as desired.

In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, server 105 uses various formulas for calculating each projection's cash flow and asset level which are aggregated into the probability of meeting a goal, percentage of likelihood of success, and/or the like. Some considerations include analysis of income, liabilities, assets, living expenses (e.g., income minus liabilities, savings, insurance premiums, taxes, and/or the like), and various scenarios (normal lifespan, disability, early death, retirement, and/or the like). Depending on the needs of system 100, analysis of such information may be broad (e.g., one value for liabilities) or detailed (e.g., specific breakdowns of each liability, such as house payment, car payment, student loans, etc.). Such flexibility of system 100 allows for wide usage of system 100 to many different applications.

Various information (e.g., text) in the form of advice may be presented to user 101 in the form of a proposal of the proposed situation portfolio. In one exemplary embodiment, there are three forms of advice: observations, strategies, and recommendations. Observations include statements that primarily discuss user's 101 current situation, such as, for example, current non-contribution to a retirement savings plan. Exemplary observations for user 101 from server 105 may include: the additional money you committed to reach your financial goals should enable you to increase the likelihood of success; you have allocated 2% of your total income to savings; although you are currently saving, the amount you are saving is below the national average; savings are an important step in helping you to successfully meet your financial goals; approximately 40% of your total income is being used to pay your liabilities; you should focus your attention on managing your debt; your earned income is the predominant source of income for maintaining your current lifestyle; currently, earned income makes up 98% of your total income; our federal marginal tax bracket is 28% and your effective tax rate is 12%; it appears that you are not maximizing your retirement plan contributions; it appears that you have done a good job of utilizing deductions to manage your income tax liability; and/or the like.

Strategies include a discussion of what user 101 can do to meet the selected financial goals, such as, for example, give consideration to investing savings in a Roth IRA. Recommendations are derived from the strategies and include the specific action steps that user 101 may take to reach its financial goals, such as, for example, give consideration to investing a specific amount in a specific mutual fund. The timing of investment and need for liquid assets may also be considered. Each observation, strategy, and recommendation can also include variable text that further personalizes the advice for user's 101 financial situation. Some examples of variable text include: user's 101 name, names of products recommended, probabilities, dollar amounts needed to meet goals, and/or the like.

In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, server 105 may categorize each observation, strategy, and/or recommendation into subcategories, such as required, recommended, or optional, for example. The purpose of these subcategories is to help speed up the preparation of advice (e.g., paragraph selection of text process) for user 101. A required observation, strategy, and/or recommendation is usually included in user's 101 proposal and helps ensure that the proposals are legally compliant. An example is advice pertaining to a strategy user 101 is considering (e.g., changes to the portfolio, increased retirement age, add disability, LTC or life insurance, etc.). A recommended observation, strategy, and/or recommendation is based on the data and the simulated results from server 105 which best suits user 101. This advice is presented to user 101 optionally, so that if user 101 prefers not to use the advice, user 101 may refuse the advice. An optional observation, strategy, and/or recommendation is based on the data and the simulated results from server 105, which may apply to user 101. However, server 105 does not have enough information to “recommend” it. This advice is presented to user 101 optionally, so that if user 101 prefers to use the advice, user 101 may request the advice. Thus, this categorization allows user 101 to easily identify what advice will be included in the proposed situation portfolio.

If user 101 wishes, the selection process can be bypassed by simply printing the proposed situation portfolio. In one exemplary embodiment, all “required” and “recommended” advice is included. This presents user 101 with a financial portfolio proposal that provides accurate, personalized advice for user 101 that complies with legal standards. Furthermore, by filtering out extraneous advice and providing individualized, legally compliant, quality financial advice to user 101, server 105 frees up user's 101 time, so that he or she can concentrate on other tasks and spend time on more complex issues. This advice may be fully editable text.

Simulator Module

Either as a part of server 105 or separate from server 105, simulator module 113 uses the data to simulate, monitor, design, and test system 100 or parts thereof (e.g., server 105, portfolio integration module 107, portfolio reconciler module 109, and stochastic modeling module 111) including recommendations for improvements to system 100 and the effects of changes. Simulator module 113 substantially mimics the operation of server 105 including portfolio integration module 107, portfolio reconciler module 109, and stochastic modeling module 111. Simulator module 113 can be in communication with portfolio integration module 107 and stochastic modeling module 111 for testing, designing, replicating, and monitoring system 100. Such testing, designing, replicating, and monitoring of system 100 can be over a predetermined amount of time (e.g., a normal lifespan, a disability lifespan, an early death lifespan, and/or the like). For example, simulator module 113 can assess changes in financial planning assumptions, tax laws, other laws and regulations, and other developments, and integrate these changes into the proposed situation portfolio.

In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, simulator module 113 may use one or more spreadsheets (e.g., Excel®) to mimic server 105. For example, simulator module 113 obtains data in connection with user 101 from server 105 via a log file of data from server 105. Simulator module 113 can access the log file by using an address (e.g., web address) associated with server 105 to identify the data and copy it to simulator module 113. The log file may include data input by user 101, market and economic projections, cash flow from various scenarios, and descriptions of the data fields in the log file. The data is copied to simulator module 113 and configured so that it may be further analyzed by simulator module 113.

Simulator module 113 uses the data to determine whether there are programming errors in server 105, which helps to validate the data. For example, simulator module 113 uses the data to calculate income, future income, liabilities, expenses, and assets and compares these calculations to the same results from server 105. This form of calculation tests whether errors have been programmed into server 105 and/or whether server 105 otherwise contains errors.

Simulator module 113 uses the data to calculate the probability of meeting a goal, percentage of likelihood of success, and/or the like to further test system 100. Such calculations can include an array of spreadsheets analyzing various data. For example, probabilities and percentages may be valued to mimic values from server 105 (e.g., 0%-49% indicates a low probability of success in achieving user's 101 selected goals; 50%-74% indicates a moderate probability of success in achieving user's 101 selected goals; and 75% or more indicates a high probability of success in achieving user's 101 selected goals). In one exemplary embodiment, simulator module 113 uses various spreadsheets of calculations (e.g., master data spreadsheet, insurance spreadsheet, Social Security/social pension, social pension spreadsheet, historical data spreadsheet, returns spreadsheet, forecasting spreadsheet, portfolio spreadsheet, testing spreadsheet, statistical spreadsheet, scenario spreadsheet, and/or the like) to analyze the data. For example, random rates of return, non-qualified assets, qualified assets, savings, lifetime goals may be used in the analysis and calculations.

Simulator module 113 can use historical portfolio data and at least one of user's 101 financial decisions, investment strategy, present cash flow, future cash flow, and goals in order to facilitate forecasting the effects of the proposed situation portfolio on user's 101 portfolio, decisions, combination of decisions, investments, policies, and/or the like. Cash flow can include at least one of income, savings, liabilities, insurance premiums, living expenses, medical expenses, inheritance, government assistance, assets, and/or the like. In addition, simulator module 113 can forecast effects based on at least one of a country's current economic data, a country's historical economic data, current world economic data, and historical world economic data.

In an exemplary embodiment, simulator module 113 can analyze many iterations of calculating such values. Simulator module 113 can use decision analysis and risk analysis products to help analyze the data, such as Crystal Ball® by Decisioneering® of Denver, Colorado. A product such as Crystal Ball® can use the data including any formulas provided by simulator module 113 to run iterations for analyzing the data. In one exemplary embodiment, simulator module 113 uses 6750 iterations of data calculations using Crystal Ball® in order to calculate the probability of meeting a goal, percentage of likelihood of success, and/or the like. Any number of iterations may be used depending on the needs of system 100. If such calculations are compared to the results of system 100 and are within a statistically predetermined amount (e.g., within 2%), then system 100 is assumed to be functioning properly. Such a predetermined amount may be set to any value (any percentage rate, another quantified value, and/or the like) depending on the needs of system 100.

Simulator module 113 can use data, such as historic or current rates of return, inflation rates, and estimated rates of return and inflation rates, to calculate the probability of meeting a goal, percentage of likelihood of success, and/or the like. If the probabilities and percentages calculated from simulator module 113 are compared to the probabilities and percentages calculated from server 105 and they correlate within a predetermined amount (e.g., within 2%), then simulator module 113 can project a properly functioning system 100. Such a predetermined amount can be varied depending on the needs (e.g., accuracy desired) of system 100.

Simulator module 113 may generate a master set of data for user 101 and then analyze that data depending on a number of predetermined scenarios. The different scenarios may represent various circumstances that user 101 may face in a lifetime that may affect user's 101 finances. For example, the master set of data may be analyzed for a normal life expectancy of user 101 and family members, disability of user 101 or family members, long-term care for user 101 or family members, early or unexpected death of user 101 or family members, and/or the like. The master data may be used to generate a spreadsheet of information for each scenario for each of the current situation and the proposed situation portfolio. The flexibility of simulator module 113 allows for analysis of such scenarios in order to better mimic server 105.

Various embodiments of system 100 are illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3 in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present invention. FIG. 2 illustrates system 100 in association with having a secure session between user 101, financial advisor 103, and server 105 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Further to FIG. 1, FIG. 2 includes an internet web server 221 in communication with financial advisor 103 via communication channel 119. Communication 119 includes a firewall and uses, for example, http or https, a WAN, a LAN, a VPN tunnel, and/or the like, for communication. For example, internet web server 221 can be in association with a secure server (e.g., American Express®) requiring a user ID and password for authentication for access. The secure session can be logged in and out by user 101 or timed out automatically. In this way, all data is stored in a trusted domain of internet web server 221 and encrypted when transmitted outside internet web server 221.

FIG. 2 further illustrates aspects of the exemplary secure session. Financial advisor 103 begins a session with user 101 and server 105 via communication channels 115, 117, and 119. Financial advisor 103 begins a web session (e.g., receives signed JARs) for a user interface of server 105. Financial advisor 103 and/or user 101 may need a user ID and password in order to gain access to internet web server 221 and begin a session. Submission of a user ID and password by financial advisor 103 and/or user 101 includes server 105 verifying the user ID and password. Server 105 uses any verification system in order to verify the user ID and password. The secure session may use any encryption method to validate or authenticate financial advisor 103 and/or user 101. If user 101 is not a new user, then financial advisor 103 retrieves the case file for user 101 from server 105. After retrieving user's 101 case file from server 105, financial advisor 103 and/or user 101 can update the personal, financial, risk tolerance, goal, and other data in association with user 101.

System 100 may run simulations and calculations using further information from an application server 223 in communication with UDB database server 231 and server 233. UDB database server 231 includes a repository database 235, a library database 237, a stocks database 239, and a bonds database 241. Repository database 235 stores data user 101 submitted to server 105. Library database 237, stocks database 239, and bonds database 241 store various information (e.g., Securities and Exchange Commission information, bond returns and information, Social Security/social pension, social pension information, tax accounting and planning information, laws and regulations, and/or the like) used in calculations by server 105. Application server 223 includes portfolio integration module 107, portfolio reconciler module 109, stochastic modeling module 111, and simulator module 113. Application server 223 uses further information from UDB database server 231 and server 233 to analyze data and create a proposed situation portfolio for user 101.

Financial advisor 103 initially reviews, reconciles, selects further data to be analyzed in connection with the proposed situation portfolio for user 101. Financial advisor 103 can reallocate user's 101 assets to attempt to meet user's 101 goals. The data is formatted and compiled into XML format, which is further converted into a PDF (Portable Document Format) document via the Arbor Text document rendering software. After such conversion and configuration, the data is presented to user 101 in the form of a proposed situation portfolio (e.g., via Adobe® Acrobat®).

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method for facilitating financial advising and planning for user 101 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Although FIG. 3 illustrates a series of method steps, it will be realized that the order of particular steps may be altered and/or other steps may be omitted altogether while still attaining the same or a similar result. In one exemplary embodiment of FIG. 3, user 101 and/or financial advisor 103 communicate with server 105 (step 301). For example, user 101 and/or financial advisor 103 opens a web browser and enters a URL for accessing server 105. A web page is returned with a link to a JNLP file (e.g., for defining JARs to download and starting web session). User 101 clicks the JNLP link and server 105 returns a mime type JNLP, and the operating system may dispatch a web start to handle such a mime type. The web start checks the version of the JRE (Java Run-time Environment) and all the jars in the JNLP check whether they have been downloaded to user 101 and/or financial advisor 105. Any jars that are not downloaded cache.

User 101 and/or financial advisor 103 gain access to server 105 (step 303). User 101 and financial advisor 103 enter user IDs and passwords into server 105 (e.g., a security service may check such credentials). Once credentials are verified, the security service returns a cookie to server 105 verifying the same. Server 105 begins a session with user 101 and financial advisor 103.

User's 101 data, goals, and risk tolerance are integrated in analyzing a customized strategy for financial portfolio planning of user 101 (305). User 101 enters data into application server 223 via financial advisor 103 and/or web server 221. The data is periodically stored in repository server 235, which also uses the log file described in FIG. 1. Server 223 analyzes the data as described in connection with server 105 in FIGS. 1 and 2. The customized strategy is compared to at least one of other strategies and projected financial decisions in order to further facilitate the financial portfolio planning of user 101 (step 307). Application server 223 analyzes the results from the customized situation portfolio and compares these results to the results from at least one of the other strategies and projected financial decisions from repository server 235.

The data from the integration is used and compared in a stochastic modeling analysis to facilitate creation of a proposed situation portfolio for user 101 (step 309). Application server 223 analyzes the data as described in connection with server 105.

Simulator module 113 mimics the operation of portfolio integration module 107, portfolio reconciler module 109, and stochastic modeling module 111 in order to test and monitor system 100 (step 311). Data may be accessed via application server 223 via web server 221. Finally, a proposed situation portfolio is presented to user 101 outlining various scenarios and recommendations for financial strategies for each (step 313).

In accordance with one embodiment, an individual investor may be combined into an economic group with investors sharing similar goals and economic factors. The portfolio integration module 107 includes a goals and assumptions identifier, which is used to input and associate a group goal and a group assumption with economic group data. The portfolio integration module 107 simulates a passage of time for the group in order to analyze the economic group's available financial resources with respect to fulfilling the group goal based upon the group assumption and processing a financial position for an economic group based upon an analysis of the available financial resources and in response to a hypothetical event and/or transaction. The portfolio integration module 107 further obtains demographic data and financial data pertaining to the economic group in order to analyze and solve the group goal in an efficient order while accounting for any dependency of future goals, based on prior goals and in accordance with the group assumption, the demographic data, and the financial data.

Other exemplary embodiments of the present invention include further assumptions. System assumptions for asset allocation and growth rates include the asset growth rates vary annually and are based on historical returns for cash, bonds, and stocks; asset growth rates for a current situation are based on current investment portfolio data; asset growth rates for the proposed situation are based on a proposed situation portfolio based on risk tolerance and the amount and timing of goals; investment portfolio (current and proposed) is adjusted annually to restore asset class weightings to their designated percentages; asset growth rates are not based on the performance of specific investment products; all persons included in this analysis who have wages that are subject to FICA or self-employment tax are fully insured and can receive full benefits; and/or the like. Omission of any assets or insurance policies in the analysis could lead to inaccuracies or distortions that would diminish its accuracy.

System assumptions for inflation include the inflation rate varies annually and is based on historical inflation rates and economic conditions in the relevant country(s); living expenses grow annually at the inflation rate (or an appropriate multiple thereof); Social Security/social pension, social pension benefits grow annually at about half the inflation rate; and/or the like.

System assumptions for taxes include, for example, income during the simulations is taxed at an average tax rate; Social Security/social pension benefits are assumed to be 50% taxable; all Social Security/social pension calculations are based on yearly intervals, regardless of actual Social Security/social pension rules; and/or the like. Time estimates of federal income tax liability assumes no carryover from previous years other than those provided. Rules exclusive to capital loss limitations and passive losses are not considered. Income taxes are calculated by applying an average tax rate to the sum of all taxable income amounts. Suggestions involving income, estate, or gift tax consequences are based on federal tax law. If user 101 is not currently receiving retirement Social Security/social pension, but indicated that he or she expects to in the future, then this analysis uses an estimate of user's 101 future retirement Social Security/social pension benefits. For example, user 101 may have provided such an estimate from his or her statement of benefits from the Social Security/social pension Administration, which is based on user's 101 actual earnings history. Otherwise, an estimate is calculated (using the Social Security/social pension Administration's methodology), which makes assumptions about user's 101 past earnings based on this year's income.

System assumptions for disability include, for example, analysis between the ages of 18 and 60 years old and earnings or self-employment income greater than $18,000 per year. If included, the disability analysis assumes that user 101 will be disabled for the first twelve years of the projection or until retirement if earlier.

System assumptions for long-term care include, for example, long-term analysis if user 101 is between the ages of 40 and 84. If included, the long-term analysis assumes that user 101 will require long-term care for the last six years of life.

System assumptions for survivor information include, for example, life expectancy of survivors of user 101 (if applicable) to determine the projection period; benefits for surviving spouses will begin immediately or at the time survivor is 60 years old (whichever is later); survivor benefits for children under age 18 years old will begin immediately; additional life insurance death benefits are not included in the decedent's estate, but do become additional investment capital for the survivor (if applicable); funeral costs are assumed to be $10,000 at death; administrative expenses are assumed to be 5% of the probate estate; income tax ramifications of withdrawals from qualified plans at death, either to pay estate settlement costs or when such assets are distributed to non-spousal heirs, are not taken into account; and/or the like. For example, whole and universal life policy cash values and premiums may be available after savings are depleted, VUL policy cash values and premiums may be available after whole and universal life polices are depleted, and consumers may spend their tax-deferred retirement assets last in order to leverage the advantages of tax-deferred growth.

System assumptions for success include, for example, having a positive investment balance (e.g., at least $1 of investment assets left at the end of the simulation (e.g., end of lifetime)); if goals occurring prior to retirement deplete investment assets, server 105 can simulate user 101 taking out a loan and directing future savings to the loan until it is paid off; simulations indicate past or future investment performance; actual results will vary and will be based on additional factors such as the asset allocation and investment products chosen and future market conditions.

System assumptions are, in one embodiment, adjusted and vary depending on the current regulations, laws, culture, preferences, and economic environment of each country. System assumptions described above are mostly in connection with the United States, but each country's assumptions should be carefully selected in connection with these variations and adjustments. Thus, although specific examples are given above, they are for illustration purposes only and should not limit the scope of system 100.

The present invention may be described herein in terms of functional block components and various processing steps. It should be appreciated that such functional blocks may be realized by any number of hardware and/or software components configured to perform the specified functions. For example, the present invention may employ various integrated circuit components, e.g., memory elements, processing elements, logic elements, look-up tables, and the like, which may carry out a variety of functions under the control of one or more microprocessors or other control devices. Similarly, the software elements of the present invention may be implemented with any programming or scripting language such as C, C++, Java, COBOL, assembler, PERL, or the like, with the various algorithms being implemented with any combination of data structures, objects, processes, routines, or other programming elements. Further, it should be noted that the present invention may employ any number of conventional techniques for data transmission, signaling, data processing, network control, and the like. For a basic introduction to cryptography, please review a text written by Bruce Schneider which is entitled “Applied Cryptography: Protocols, Algorithms, And Source Code In C,” published by John Wiley & Sons (second edition, 1996), which is hereby incorporated by reference.

It should be appreciated that the particular implementations shown and described herein are illustrative of the invention and its best mode and are not intended to otherwise limit the scope of the present invention in any way. Indeed, for the sake of brevity, conventional data networking, application development, and other functional aspects of the systems (and components of the individual operating components of the systems) may not be described in detail herein. Furthermore, the connecting lines shown in the various figures contained herein are intended to represent exemplary functional relationships and/or physical couplings between the various elements. It should be noted that many alternative or additional functional relationships or physical connections may be present in a practical electronic transaction system.

It will be appreciated that many applications of the present invention could be formulated. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the network may include any system for exchanging data or transacting business, such as the Internet, an intranet, an extranet, WAN, LAN, satellite communications, and/or the like. The users may interact with the system via any input device such as a keyboard, mouse, kiosk, personal digital assistant, handheld computer (e.g., Palm Pilot®), cellular phone, and/or the like. Similarly, the invention could be used in conjunction with any type of personal computer, network computer, workstation, minicomputer, mainframe, or the like running any operating system such as any version of Windows, Windows NT, Windows 2000, Windows 98, Windows 95, MacOS, OS/2, BeOS, Linux, UNIX, or the like. Moreover, although the invention may be described herein as being implemented with TCP/IP communications protocols, it will be readily understood that the invention could also be implemented using IPX, Appletalk, IP-6, NetBIOS, OSI, or any number of existing or future protocols. Moreover, the system contemplates the use, sale, or distribution of any goods (including downloadable software related to the computer application of the invention), services, or information over any network having similar functionality described herein.

Communication channels 115 117, and 119 are any hardware and/or software for enabling communication between user 101, financial advisor 103, and server 105. For example, communication channels 115 117, and 119 may include any communications system that enables the transmission or exchange of data and/or facilitates electronic commercial transactions. Exemplary communication channels 115 117, and 119 include the Internet, an intranet, an extranet, a wide area network (WAN), local area network (LAN), satellite communications, and/or the like. In an exemplary embodiment, user 101, financial advisor 103, and server 105 may be suitably in communication with communication channels 115 117, and 119 via data links. A variety of conventional communications media and protocols may be used for data links, such as a connection to an Internet Service Provider (ISP) over a local loop, as is typically used associated with standard modem communication, cable modem, Dish networks, ISDN, Digital Subscriber Line (DSL), or various wireless communication methods. User 101, financial advisor 103, and server 105 may each also reside within a LAN, which interfaces to communication channels 115 117, and 119 via a leased line (e.g., T1, D3, and/or the like). Such communication methods are well known in the art and are covered in a variety of standard texts. See, e.g., Gilbert Held, Understanding Data Communications (1996), which is hereby incorporated by reference.

Communication between participants in the system of the present invention is accomplished through any suitable communication channel, such as, for example, a telephone network, public switch telephone network, intranet, Internet, extranet, WAN, LAN, point of interaction device (e.g., point of sale device, personal digital assistant, cellular phone, kiosk terminal, automated teller machine (ATM), and/or the like), online communications, off-line communications, wireless communications, satellite communications, and/or the like. The network may also be implemented as other types of networks, such as an interactive television (ITV) network. It will appreciated that, for security reasons, any databases, systems, or components of the present invention may consist of any combination of databases or components at a single location or at multiple locations, wherein each database or system includes any of various suitable security features, such as firewalls, access codes, encryption, de-encryption, compression, decompression, and/or the like.

Any databases and any other data storage devices referred to herein may include any type of hardware and/or software device, which is configured to store and maintain card-holder transaction data and any other suitable information. Exemplary devices include any suitable type of database, such as relational, hierarchical, object-oriented, and/or the like. Common database products that may be used to implement transaction history database 116, databases 110, 112, 122, and any other data storage devices referred to herein include DB2 by IBM (White Plains, N.Y.), any of the database products available from Oracle Corporation (Redwood Shores, Calif.), Microsoft Access by Microsoft Corporation (Redmond, Wash.), or any other database product. Transaction history database 116, databases 110, 112, 122, and any other data storage devices referred to herein may be organized in any suitable manner including as data tables or lookup tables.

Association of certain data may be accomplished through any data association technique known and practiced in the art. For example, the association may be accomplished either manually or automatically. Automatic association techniques may include, for example, a database search, a database merge, GREP, AGREP, SQL, and/or the like. The association step may be accomplished by a database merge function, for example, using a “key field” in each of the manufacturer and retailer data tables. A “key field” partitions the database according to the high-level class of objects defined by the key field. For example, a certain class may be designated as a key field in both the first data table and the second data table, and the two data tables may then be merged on the basis of the class data in the key field. In this embodiment, the data corresponding to the key field in each of the merged data tables is preferably the same. However, data tables having similar, though not identical, data in the key fields may also be merged by using AGREP, for example.

The financial advisor/planner and consumer/client may represent individual people, entities, or businesses. It is further noted that other participants may be involved in some phases of the financial planning process, such as intermediary investment brokers, mutual fund operators, and the like, but these participants are not shown.

Each participant or user of the system of the present invention, including consumers, financial advisors, and/or the like, for example, may be equipped with a suitable computing system to facilitate communications and transactions with any other participant.

For example, some or all participants may have access to a computing unit in the form of a personal computer, although other types of computing units may be used, including laptops, notebooks, handheld computers (e.g., a Palm Pilot®), set-top boxes, kiosk terminals, personal digital assistants, cellular phones, and the like. Additionally, other participants may have computing systems which may be implemented in the form of a computer server, PC server, workstation, minicomputer, mainframe, a networked set of computers, or any other suitable implementations which are known in the art or may hereafter be devised. A participant's computing system may include any suitable operating system, such as any version of Windows, Windows NT, Windows 2000, Windows 98, Windows 95, MacOS, OS/2, BeOS, Linux, UNIX, or the like. Further, although the invention may be described herein as being implemented with TCP/IP communications protocols, it will be readily understood that the invention could also be implemented using IPX, Appletalk, IP-6, NetBIOS, OSI, or any number of existing or future protocols. Moreover, the system contemplates the use, sale, or distribution of any goods, services, or information over any network having functionality similar to that described herein.

The computing systems may be connected with each other via a data communications network or communication channel. For example, the network may be a public network, which is assumed to be insecure and open to eavesdroppers. In one embodiment, the network is embodied as the Internet. In this context, the computers may or may not be connected to the Internet at all times. For instance, a participant's computer may employ a modem to occasionally connect to the Internet, whereas a financial advisor computing system, and/or another computing system might maintain a permanent connection to the Internet. Specific information related to the protocols, standards, and application software used associated with the Internet are not discussed herein. For further information regarding such details, see, for example, Dilip Naik, Internet Standards and Protocols (1998); Java 2 Complete, various authors (Sybex 1999); Deborah Ray and Eric Ray, Mastering HTML 4.0 (1997); and Loshin, TCP/IP Clearly Explained (1997). Each of these texts is hereby incorporated by reference.

As will be appreciated, the present invention may be embodied as a method, a data processing system, a device for data processing, and/or a computer program product. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the form of an entirely software embodiment, an entirely hardware embodiment, or an embodiment combining aspects of both software and hardware. Furthermore, the present invention may take the form of a computer program product on a computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable program code means embodied in the storage medium. Any suitable computer-readable storage medium may be used, including hard disks, CD-ROM, optical storage devices, magnetic storage devices, and/or the like.

The present invention may be described with reference to screen shots (such as input screen shots and output screen shots, for example), block diagrams, and flowchart illustrations of methods, apparatus (e.g., systems), and computer program products according to various aspects of the invention. It will be understood that each screen shot, functional block of the block diagrams and the flowchart illustrations, and combinations of functional blocks in the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations, respectively, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be loaded onto a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus create means for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart block or blocks.

These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function specified in the flowchart block or blocks. The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer-implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart block or blocks.

Accordingly, functional blocks of the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations support combinations of means for performing the specified functions, combinations of steps for performing the specified functions, and program instruction means for performing the specified functions. It will also be understood that each functional block of the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations, and combinations of functional blocks in the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations, can be implemented by either special purpose hardware-based computer systems which perform the specified functions or steps, or suitable combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.

In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, it will be appreciated that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative manner, rather than a restrictive one, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of present invention.

Benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described above with regard to specific embodiments. However, the benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as critical, required, or essential features or elements. As used herein, the terms “comprises”, “comprising”, “including”, or any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Further, no element described herein is required for the practice of the invention unless expressly described as “essential” or “critical”. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A probability modeling system comprising: a processor for facilitating financial portfolio advising and planning; and a tangible memory configured to communicate with the processor, the memory having a plurality of software modules stored thereon, each module in the plurality of software modules having instructions executed by the processor, wherein the plurality of modules comprises: a portfolio integration module configured to receive and integrate data, wherein the data includes goals, assets, savings and risk tolerance of a client, wherein the portfolio integration module is further configured to compute a customized strategy based on the received data; a portfolio reconciler module configured to compare a customized strategy to at least one of other strategies, based on the received and integrated data in order to further facilitate the financial portfolio planning of the client, wherein the financial portfolio planning analyzes both planned hypothetical events and unplanned hypothetical events, wherein the unplanned hypothetical events comprise at least one of a disability, a retirement date, a death or a divorce; a stochastic modeling module configured to further analyze proposed situation portfolios based on future uncertainties, wherein future uncertainties include the unplanned hypothetical events; a simulation module configured to compute a probability of meeting the client's goals; the probability modeling system further configured to: analyze results from at least one of a financial advice application, the portfolio reconciler module or the stochastic modeling module and, based at least partially on the results, determine a plurality of proposed allocations for the client based upon a risk tolerance, a goal timing schedule and a goals value, wherein the determining the plurality of proposed allocations comprises determining: a proposed regular assets allocation; a proposed regular contributions allocation for ongoing contributions to regular accounts; a proposed retirement allocation for retirement plan ongoing contributions; a proposed variable universal life (“VUL”) goal funding allocation comprising insurance cash values and premiums for VUL policies used to fund goals; and a proposed VUL non-goal funding allocation for policies comprising insurance cash values and premiums for VUL policies not used to fund goals.
 2. The probability modeling system of claim 1, wherein the portfolio reconciler module is further configured to monitor buy, sell, and hold recommendations for the proposed situation portfolio and dynamically update the proposed situation portfolio with the at least one of: buy, sell, and hold recommendations.
 3. The probability modeling system of claim 1, wherein the stochastic modeling module uses at least one of a stationary bootstrap sampling method and a synchronous stationary bootstrap sampling method.
 4. The probability modeling system of claim 1, wherein the stochastic modeling module is further configured to measure a probability of the client reaching a goal of the client.
 5. The probability modeling system of claim 1, wherein the stochastic modeling module is further configured to forecast effects based on at least one of: current economic data of a country, historical economic data of a country, current world economic data; or historical world economic data.
 6. The probability modeling system of claim 1, wherein the stochastic modeling module is further configured to facilitate use of at least one of: historical portfolio data, historical economic data, financial decisions, investment strategy, present cash flow, future cash flow, or goals of the client in order to facilitate forecasting effects of the proposed situation portfolio on the portfolio of the client.
 7. The probability modeling system of claim 1, wherein the stochastic modeling module is further configured to: facilitate forecasting effects of the proposed situation portfolio on a current situation portfolio of the client; monitor at least one of the portfolio integration module, the portfolio reconciler module, and the stochastic modeling module; simulate at least one of the portfolio integration module, the portfolio reconciler module, and the stochastic modeling module; and test at least one of the portfolio integration module, the portfolio reconciler module, and the stochastic modeling module.
 8. The probability modeling system of claim 1, wherein the stochastic modeling module is further configured to estimate a p value in a bootstrap sampling method using at least one of the following: autocorrelation depending on lag alone; or estimating standard errors of bootstrapped samples for an original series and comparing the estimated standard errors for independent bootstraps.
 9. The probability modeling system of claim 8, wherein the estimating the p value includes arriving at a 1/p value between 25 and
 50. 10. The probability modeling system of claim 1, wherein the proposed situation portfolio is created by analysis of at least one of a normal life span, disability, long-term care, early death, life insurance information, disability insurance information, Social Security, social pension, asset structure, savings, goals, retirement information, expenses, tax structure of assets, savings, company or pension information.
 11. The probability modeling system of claim 1, wherein the proposed situation portfolio is created by: creating, based at least in part on a stochastic analysis, first customized timelines for at least one of: normal life span, disability, long-term care, early death, life insurance information, disability insurance information, Social Security, social pension, asset structure, savings, goals, retirement information, expenses, tax structure of assets, savings, or company pension information; creating, based at least in part on a stochastic analysis, second customized timelines for each member of a family; and analyzing, based at least in part on a stochastic analysis, life expectancy on factors other than retirement information.
 12. The probability modeling system of claim 1, wherein the portfolio integration module further includes: inputs and associates a group goal and a group assumption with economic group data; simulates a group passage of time, to analyze available financial resources for an economic group with respect to fulfilling the group goal based upon the group assumption; processes a financial position for the economic group based upon an analysis of the available financial resources and in response to the at least one of: planned hypothetical events, unplanned hypothetical events, and transactions, wherein the portfolio integration module obtains demographic data and financial data pertaining to the economic group and, wherein the portfolio integration module analyzes and solves the group goal in an efficient order, accounting for any dependency of future goals upon prior goals, based upon the group assumption, the demographic data, and the financial data.
 13. The probability modeling system of claim 1, wherein the simulation module is further configured to: identify historical test data to apply to a simulation, wherein the test data includes at least one of client input, market projections, economic projections, historical portfolio data, and cash flow from a plurality of scenarios; receive the historical test data; select a test scenario, wherein the test scenario includes a test goal; simulate the portfolio integration module, the portfolio reconciler module, and the stochastic modeling module using the historical test data and test scenario; assemble simulation results from the simulation; compare the simulation results to actual results produced by the portfolio integration module, the portfolio reconciler module, and the stochastic modeling module; and in response to the simulation results not matching the actual results, modify at least one of: the portfolio integration module, the portfolio reconciler module, and the stochastic modeling module.
 14. The probability modeling system of claim 1, wherein the portfolio integration module is further configured to at least one: advise, simulate or select a specific investment instrument based on the customized strategy.
 15. The probability modeling system of claim 1, wherein the planned hypothetical events include at least one of: an expected lifespan of the client or an average lifespan of a family member associated with the client, wherein the expected lifespan is based on health of the client and family history, and wherein the average lifespan is based on health of the client and family history.
 16. The probability modeling system of claim 1, wherein each of the goals are weighted based on at least one of: client preference for importance of a respective one of the goals, importance of a timeframe for achieving the respective one of the goals, or a timeframe for achieving the respective one of the goals.
 17. The probability modeling system of claim 1, wherein the determining the plurality of proposed allocations further comprises determining a short-term allocation regular assets amount.
 18. The probability modeling system of claim 1, further configured to: receive client input relating to goals of the client; communicate with the portfolio integration module, the portfolio reconciler module, and the stochastic modeling module; receive, from a plurality of disparate providers, a plurality of distinct financial advice client input.
 19. A non-transitory tangible computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions stored thereon comprising modules that, when executed by a computer for facilitating financial portfolio advising and planning, cause the computer to perform operations comprising: receive and integrate data, by a portfolio integration module, wherein the data includes goals, assets, savings and risk tolerance of a client, wherein the portfolio integration module is further configured to compute a customized strategy based on the received data; compare, by a portfolio reconciler module, a customized strategy to at least one of other strategies, based on the received and integrated data in order to further facilitate the financial portfolio planning of the client, wherein the financial portfolio planning analyzes both planned hypothetical events and unplanned hypothetical events, wherein the unplanned hypothetical events comprise at least one of a disability, a retirement date, a death or a divorce; further analyze, by a stochastic modeling module, proposed situation portfolios based on future uncertainties, wherein future uncertainties include the unplanned hypothetical events; compute, by a simulation module, a probability of meeting the client's goals; analyze results from at least one of a financial advice application, the portfolio reconciler module or the stochastic modeling module and, based at least partially on the results, determine a plurality of proposed allocations for the client based upon a risk tolerance, a goal timing schedule and a goals value, wherein the determining the plurality of proposed allocations comprises determining: a proposed regular assets allocation; a proposed regular contributions allocation for ongoing contributions to regular accounts; a proposed retirement allocation for retirement plan ongoing contributions; a proposed variable universal life (“VUL”) goal funding allocation comprising insurance cash values and premiums for VUL policies used to fund goals; and a proposed VUL non-goal funding allocation for policies comprising insurance cash values and premiums for VUL policies not used to fund goals. 